Its README, tests, and MIT license improve transparency, but the lone maintainer and absent security policy limit confidence. The workflows also use five unpinned actions and include one archived action.
43%
Total Score
50
90
75
Only one registry account has publish access, and the repository is user-owned rather than organization-backed. This leaves little visible publishing capacity if the maintainer becomes unavailable.
The package has made no release in nearly six years and has had zero releases in the last 12 months. Its early releases were frequent, but the prolonged inactivity is a substantial abandonment concern.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the long release gap. The repository is not archived, which provides only limited compensation.
No security policy is present in the linked repository, reducing transparency for reporting and handling vulnerabilities. The package's MIT declaration addresses licensing but does not compensate for this process gap.
All five analyzed action references are unpinned, and the audit found a high-confidence archived action. No dangerous trigger or untrusted checkout was found, but the workflow supply-chain hygiene remains weak.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
funct/funct Version ^1.5 | — | — |
symfony/yaml Version ^5.1 | — | — |
docopt/docopt Version ^1.0 | — | — |
symfony/string Version ^5.1 | — | — |
tightenco/collect Version ^8.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.