mlw/sms

The small codebase includes tests, a usable README, an MIT license, and no install-time scripts. Its single release was about two years ago, with no commits or active maintainers in the last three months and no security policy.

Latest v1.0.0

Packagist

52%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability

Dependencies

100

Maturity

Supply Chain

Health Score Breakdown

Repo commit activity

There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months. Combined with the single-release history, this is the clearest abandonment concern.

Release history

This is the only release, published about two years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. The stable version and complete small codebase partly offset the lack of release activity, but maintenance evidence is weak.

Repo popularity

The repository has zero stars and forks and one watcher, offering little external adoption evidence. Popularity is supporting evidence only, so this modestly lowers confidence rather than deciding the result.

Repo tooling

Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools were detected. For a small SDK this is a hygiene gap rather than a standalone severe risk.

Repository archived

The repository is not archived, but its last push was about two years ago. The unarchived state preserves availability without proving active maintenance.