Package Health

mindbox/sdk

This release appears usable and backed by an active organization-owned repository, with a stable version, recent release, no deprecation, a substantial source tree, repository tests, and no install-time lifecycle scripts or dangerous workflow patterns. However, maintenance activity is currently weak: there were zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last 3 months, issue activity has largely stalled, and the package lacks licensing evidence and several security-transparency controls. These concerns warrant caution for long-term adoption, but the recent release, repository push, organizational backing, and compensating repository documentation keep it above the unhealthy range.

Latest 1.2.0PackagistPackagist

68%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

67

Dependencies
Dependencies
Evaluates the health and security of package dependencies

100

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

88

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

88

Health Score Breakdown

Licensecaution

No declared license and no license file were found in the artifact or repository, leaving the legal terms for dependency use unclear. This is a genuine transparency concern rather than an unknown metadata field because license_source is explicitly none.

Repo commit activitycaution

There were zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last 3 months, a significant indication that day-to-day maintenance has currently stalled. The recent package release and repository push provide some compensating evidence, but not enough to make this fully healthy.

Repo issue activitycaution

The repository has 8 open issues and 6 open pull requests, with no new or closed issues in the last month and only 1 merged pull request. This suggests backlog and limited recent project interaction, lowering confidence in responsive maintenance.

Repo toolingcaution

Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools were detected. The absence of automated security scanning is a transparency and maintenance gap, though it is not by itself evidence that the package is unsafe.

Security policycaution

The repository has no security policy, so the process for reporting and handling vulnerabilities is not documented. This is a moderate transparency gap for a dependency but not a standalone disqualifier.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

No maintainer information available.

Direct Dependencies

DependencyLast ReleaseScore
psr/log
Version ^1.1|^2|^3

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
21 days ago
Created
7 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform