mikespub/codedread-kthoom
All six workflow actions are unpinned, and the repository has no security policy, leaving avoidable maintenance and supply-chain hygiene gaps. MIT licensing, a complete README, repository tests, recent releases, and active project ownership provide useful compensating evidence.
66%
Total Score
75
100
50
Health Score Breakdown
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. Although the latest release was recent, this leaves current maintenance momentum uncertain and raises abandonment risk.
The repository has no security policy. For a browser reader handling local files and network sources, the missing reporting guidance is a meaningful transparency gap.
Both workflows were analyzed completely with no untrusted checkouts, script injection, or high-severity findings, and one scopes permissions at job level. However, all 6 of 6 action references are unpinned, which weakens build reproducibility and supply-chain hygiene.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 codedread |
| mikespub |
Direct Dependencies
No direct dependencies.
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 8 months ago
- Created
- 12 months ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.