Documentation, licensing, and repository structure are strong, and the organization-backed repository matches the package. Automated checks show no dangerous workflow findings, though its security documentation is thin.
68%
Total Score
75
92
50
The package has existed for nearly 10 years with 14 releases, but it has had no release in the last 18 months. That suggests slower maintenance and lowers confidence in ongoing support.
The repository recorded no commits and no active maintainers in the last 3 months, consistent with the long release gap. This is a maintenance concern, though not proof of abandonment by itself.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented. This is a transparency gap, but the package is organization-backed and the repository remains active enough to provide some compensating context.
All 5 analyzed action references are unpinned, which weakens build reproducibility and supply-chain hygiene. The audit found no dangerous triggers, untrusted checkouts, script injection, or other reported findings, limiting the impact to caution.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
middlewares/utils Version ^2 || ^3 || ^4 | — | — |
psr/http-server-middleware Version ^1 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.