micschk/silverstripe-namedlinkfield
The repository is actively maintained, with five releases in the last year, current source updates, tests, and a clear license. CI action references are all unpinned, and the repository has no security policy, but those concerns are secondary.
20%
Total Score
83
50
Health Score Breakdown
Packagist marks the entire package abandoned and names restruct/silverstripe-namedlinkfield as its replacement. This makes the assessed package a poor dependency target despite otherwise healthy project activity.
The repository has no documented security policy. This is a transparency gap for reporting and handling vulnerabilities, though it does not by itself show abandonment.
The single workflow was fully analyzed without untrusted checkouts, script injection, or high-severity findings, but all four action references are unpinned, leaving avoidable build-integrity risk.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 Restruct web & apps |
Direct Dependencies
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
 silverstripe/framework Version ^6 | — | — |
silverstripe/vendor-plugin Version ^3 | — | — |
sheadawson/silverstripe-dependentdropdownfield Version ^4 | — | — |
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 3 days ago
- Created
- 10 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.