The package includes tests and has released four times in the last 12 months. Its proprietary license, missing README, repository-name mismatch, and no commits in the last three months reduce transparency and maintenance confidence.
58%
Total Score
50
70
50
The manifest declares a proprietary license, so the release is licensed, but no license file is present and the terms are not clearly open-source-friendly for general dependency use.
Tests are present in both the package context and repository, which is positive, but the package has no README; for a Symfony bundle, that weakens integration guidance. The absent changelog is normal packaging practice.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, which lowers confidence in ongoing maintenance even though a release was published during the broader 12-month period.
The repository name does not match the package name, and no README package mention was collected, so the linkage between the published package and its source is less transparent.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented. This is a modest transparency gap rather than evidence of unsafe code.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
symfony/config Version ^6.1 || ^7.0 || ^8.0 | — | — |
myclabs/deep-copy Version ^1.11 | — | — |
symfony/http-kernel Version ^6.1 || ^7.0 || ^8.0 | — | — |
micro-module/fault-tolerance Version ^0.9 || ^0.10 || ^0.11 | — | — |
symfony/dependency-injection Version ^6.1 || ^7.0 || ^8.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.