The license text conflicts with the declared LGPL-3.0-only license, creating a distribution and compliance question. The artifact has a clear README and no install-time scripts, but provides little evidence of ongoing project support.
42%
Total Score
25
63
75
The package has had only one release, published about seven years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk for a binary dependency.
The repository has had zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the long release gap and indicating no visible ongoing maintenance.
A license file is present, but it was detected as GPL-3.0 while the manifest declares LGPL-3.0-only. That mismatch requires clarification before relying on the package.
There are no open issues or pull requests and no recent issue or pull-request activity. In combination with the absent commits, this provides no evidence of active project support.
The linked repository has no security policy. For a package distributing executable binaries, this reduces transparency around vulnerability reporting, although it is less significant than the lack of maintenance.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.