Documentation, tests, release notes, and licensing make integration and ownership clear. Maintenance is active, but recent work is concentrated in one contributor and workflow references are not pinned.
72%
Total Score
75
100
94
83
The repository owner is an individual account rather than an organization, so there is no provided organizational backing to offset the concentrated contributor activity. The active release and commit history still provide meaningful maintenance evidence.
One contributor made all 18 commits in the last three months, giving the project a concentrated recent bus factor. The active commit volume compensates for abandonment risk only partly, so succession capacity remains a concern.
Composer is used for builds, but no security scanning tools were detected. The missing scanning is a modest repository-hygiene gap rather than evidence that the release is unsafe.
The repository has no security policy. For a package handling payment integrations, this weakens the documented path for reporting and managing security issues.
The single workflow was fully analyzed with no injection, untrusted-checkout, or high-severity findings, and it has no top-level write permissions. However, all six referenced actions are unpinned, leaving builds exposed to upstream action changes.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
mews/pos Version ^2.0 | — | — |
illuminate/config Version ^8.0|^9.0|^10.0|^11.0|^12.0|^13.0 | — | — |
illuminate/support Version ^8.0|^9.0|^10.0|^11.0|^12.0|^13.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.