Documentation is largely a template, and the project has no security policy or scanning. The MIT license, matching repository, and clean dependency-install behavior provide useful transparency.
55%
Total Score
50
79
75
The artifact includes a README, changelog, and release notes for this version; the absence of packaged tests is normal. However, the README contains mostly uncustomized template text, limiting consumer guidance.
This package has only one release, published about 2 years and 10 months ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That is meaningful evidence of limited maintenance, though the repository remains available.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last 3 months. This weakens evidence of ongoing maintenance for a package whose only release is already about 2 years and 10 months old.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. This is a modest transparency and maintenance gap rather than a severe dependency risk.
The linked repository has no security policy. For a small package this is a limited gap, but it leaves vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
illuminate/support Version * | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.