Recent releases show the project is still maintained, but repository activity has been absent for about 6 months and only one maintainer is listed. Testing, licensing, and package-to-repository alignment are solid; the missing security policy is a smaller transparency gap.
68%
Total Score
50
100
88
88
Only one registry account has publish access, leaving little publishing redundancy. The linked repository and recent release provide some compensation, but a single-person maintainer base still increases continuity risk.
The repository is owned by the same individual user namespace as the package rather than an organization. That matches the single-maintainer context and provides no additional organizational continuity.
No commits and no active maintainers were recorded in the last 3 months, despite a release about 6 months ago. This pause lowers confidence in ongoing maintenance and responsiveness.
Composer is used as the build tool, which fits the package ecosystem, but no security scanning tools were detected. The missing scanning coverage is a modest hygiene concern rather than evidence of abandonment.
The repository has no security policy, leaving no documented channel or process for reporting vulnerabilities. This is a transparency gap for a library that handles database type integration.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
doctrine/dbal Version ^2.7|^3.0 | — | — |
mediagone/small-uid Version ^0.6|^0.7 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.