Clear documentation, an MIT license, and a matching source repository make the package straightforward to inspect. Its small project footprint and lack of security tooling leave limited operational evidence beyond the current code.
62%
Total Score
50
100
88
83
The package and repository are owned by the same individual account, so the ownership path is consistent. This also means the project has a single-person backing model rather than organizational support.
The package has four releases across more than nine years, with no release in the last 12 months and a median interval of about 910 days. This indicates a slow maintenance cadence, though it may fit a small, stable plugin.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. Combined with the lack of recent registry releases, this is evidence of currently inactive maintenance.
The repository uses Composer, but no security scanning tools were detected. For a small plugin this is a modest hygiene gap, not evidence of abandonment by itself.
The repository has no security policy. This weakens vulnerability-reporting transparency, though it is a limited concern for a small package with no other observed repository risk.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
craftcms/cms Version ^4.0.0|^5.0.0 | — | — |
nesbot/carbon Version ^2.0.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.