The repository has no security policy, security scanning, or tests, and its very small audience offers little evidence of ongoing support. MIT licensing, a matching repository, a clear README, and a minimal dependency set reduce adoption friction but do not offset the maintenance gap.
43%
Total Score
50
100
83
83
There were zero commits and zero active maintainers during the last three months. Combined with no registry releases for over 9 years, this materially raises abandonment risk.
The latest registry release was over 9 years ago, with zero releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk despite the earlier burst of releases.
One issue and one pull request remain open, while none were created or closed in the last month. This indicates little recent project interaction.
The repository has only 2 stars and 5 forks, providing limited supporting evidence of community adoption or review. Low popularity alone is not decisive, but it reinforces the maintenance concern.
Composer is used for the build, which fits the package ecosystem, but no security scanning tools are configured. The missing scanning is a modest repository hygiene gap.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
nategood/httpful Version ^0.2.20 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.