The repository is unarchived and the release has a valid MIT declaration. It is a tiny package with no tests, README, security policy, or recent project activity.
42%
Total Score
0
100
60
75
The package has had only two releases, both dating from about seven years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk.
There were no commits or active maintainers in the last three months, despite the repository being pushed about two years ago. That limited recent activity weakens confidence in ongoing maintenance.
The artifact has no README, tests, or changelog, while the repository also reports no tests or changelog. These are meaningful transparency and maintenance gaps for a small library, though the GitHub release record provides some release documentation evidence.
The repository name does not exactly match the package name, and the README mention could not be determined. This creates some uncertainty about repository-package alignment, though the source tree corresponds to the package artifact.
The repository has no security policy. For a package that may handle database documentation, this leaves vulnerability-reporting expectations unclear.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
vlucas/phpdotenv Version ^3.4@dev | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.