The package has a focused dependency set, documented usage, tests, and an organization-owned repository. Its licensing metadata conflicts with the detected MIT license, maintenance has been inactive since December 2023, and the workflow uses three unpinned actions.
60%
Total Score
75
100
86
75
The manifest declares a proprietary license while the artifact and repository contain an MIT license file. The release is licensed, but the mismatch creates legal ambiguity for consumers.
The package has had no release in roughly two years and nine months, with zero releases in the last 12 months. Its eight-release history shows an established project, but the long current gap raises maintenance risk.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the long release gap. This weakens evidence of ongoing maintenance, although the project is not archived.
The workflow was fully analyzed, uses read-only permissions, and has no dangerous findings or untrusted checkouts. However, all three action references are unpinned, leaving avoidable build-reproducibility and action-substitution exposure.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
doctrine/lexer Version ^2.0 || ^3.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.