Package Health

manuxi/sulu-testimonials-bundle

This is a generally usable and well-documented package with a stable release, frequent registry releases, an MIT license, tests, substantial source structure, safe read-only workflow permissions, and no deprecation or archive status. The main concerns are that repository commit activity shows no commits and no active maintainers in the last 3 months, the package has only one registry maintainer, and the repository lacks a security policy and security-scanning tooling. The recent release and push timestamps provide some evidence of ongoing publishing, but the apparent lack of recent commit activity limits confidence in sustained maintenance; adoption is reasonable with routine dependency and release monitoring.

Latest 1.5.6PackagistPackagist

72%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

50

Dependencies
Dependencies
Evaluates the health and security of package dependencies

100

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

89

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

90

Health Score Breakdown

Maintainerscaution

Only one registry account has publish access, which creates a limited publishing bus factor. Because the repository is user-owned rather than organization-backed, there is no organizational ownership evidence to compensate for this limitation.

Project backingcaution

The repository is owned by the user account manuxi, not an organization. This is consistent with a small personal project but provides less institutional backing or maintainer redundancy.

Repo commit activitycaution

The repository records 0 commits and 0 active maintainers over the last 3 months. This conflicts somewhat with the frequent release history and recent push timestamp, but the observed activity still warrants caution about sustained development capacity.

Repo popularitycaution

The repository has 1 star, 1 fork, and 1 watcher, so external adoption and community redundancy appear limited. Popularity is supporting evidence only, and the package otherwise has meaningful documentation and structure.

Repo toolingcaution

Composer is used as a build tool, but no security-scanning tools are detected. The absence of scanning lowers security-process transparency, though it is not by itself evidence that the package is unsafe.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

Manuxi

Direct Dependencies

DependencyLast ReleaseScore
sulu/sulu
Version ^3.0
—
—
symfony/intl
Version ^6.4 | ^7.0
—
—
symfony/config
Version ^6.4 | ^7.0
—
—
twig/intl-extra
Version ^3.23
—
—
twig/extra-bundle
Version ^3.23
—
—

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
17 days ago
Created
1 year ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform