The package includes a substantial README, tests, an MIT license, and read-only workflow permissions. Its six releases all arrived within one day, while four of five workflow actions are unpinned; repository security scanning is also absent.
60%
Total Score
50
88
67
Six releases were published within one day, so the project has not yet demonstrated a sustained release or maintenance pattern.
The repository records zero commits and zero active maintainers during the last three months. Because the package is newly published, this is a caution about demonstrated maintenance capacity rather than proof of abandonment.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. That is a modest transparency and maintenance gap, not a severe risk by itself.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability reporting expectations unclear for a package intended to process web content and generate PDFs.
Both workflows were analyzed successfully, use read-only permissions, and have no audit findings or untrusted code paths. However, four of five action references are unpinned, weakening build reproducibility and update integrity.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
sulu/sulu Version ^3.0 | — | — |
doctrine/dbal Version ^3.6 || ^4.0 | — | — |
dompdf/dompdf Version ^3.1 | — | — |
symfony/string Version ^6.4 || ^7.0 | — | — |
bacon/bacon-qr-code Version ^3.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.