Documentation is thorough, and licensing is clear. The small project has two active contributors and no archived or deprecated status, while workflow pinning remains the main hygiene gap.
84%
Total Score
80
100
94
67
Only one account has registry publish access, which creates some publishing concentration. Repository activity shows two active contributors, partly compensating for that registry-side limitation.
The package and repository are owned by the same individual account rather than an organization. That limits formal handoff capacity, though recent activity from two contributors provides some compensation.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. This is a modest transparency gap rather than evidence of abandonment.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability-reporting expectations undocumented. This lowers transparency but is not severe for the overall health assessment.
Both workflows were fully audited, use read-only permissions, and contain no high- or medium-confidence findings. However, 4 of 5 action references are unpinned, which weakens build reproducibility and supply-chain hygiene.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
sulu/sulu Version ^3.0 | — | — |
symfony/intl Version ^6.2 | ^7.0 | — | — |
symfony/config Version ^6.2 | ^7.0 | — | — |
twig/intl-extra Version ^3.12 | — | — |
twig/extra-bundle Version ^3.12 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.