The MIT license, substantial README, tests, changelog, and clean install profile support straightforward adoption. Maintenance history is too new to establish staying power, and the workflows use four unpinned actions; pin a later release after sustained activity is visible.
65%
Total Score
50
92
67
The package was first released and reached its latest release within the same day, with four releases in the last 12 months; this shows active initial publishing but no established maintenance record.
The repository has zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. Because the project is newly published, this is primarily missing evidence of sustained maintenance rather than proof of abandonment.
The repository has no security policy. This is a transparency and vulnerability-reporting gap, although the package's small size and otherwise documented repository partly limit its significance.
Both workflows were analyzed successfully, use read-only permissions, and have no reported audit findings or unsafe-trigger sinks. However, all four action references are unpinned, leaving the build exposed to action changes over time.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
sulu/sulu Version ^3.0 | — | — |
symfony/console Version ^6.4 || ^7.0 | — | — |
symfony/framework-bundle Version ^6.4 || ^7.0 | — | — |
symfony/dependency-injection Version ^6.4 || ^7.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.