The MIT license, matching repository, and simple dependency set are reassuring. There are no repository tests or security policy, so ongoing maintenance needs extra scrutiny.
52%
Total Score
75
100
79
75
The package includes a README, but neither the published artifact nor the repository reports tests or a changelog. Missing tests are a maintenance gap for a library, while the absent changelog is less significant for a small package.
The package has had no release in more than two years, despite 13 releases since November 2023. This is a meaningful maintenance concern, though the repository is not archived.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, indicating currently inactive development. The organization-backed repository provides some continuity but does not offset the lack of recent work.
The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher, showing little visible community adoption. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a decisive health measure, especially for a small organization-backed package.
The repository has no security policy, leaving disclosure and response expectations undocumented. This is a transparency and maintenance weakness, not evidence that the package is unsafe.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
maliboot/utils Version * | — | — |
maliboot/lombok Version * | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.