The library has a substantial README, tests, matching repository, and clear MIT licensing. A single registry maintainer and no security scanning leave limited evidence of ongoing support or security practice.
38%
Total Score
50
71
50
Only one release exists, published about 10 years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment for a library consumers may need to maintain over time.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, reinforcing the long-term maintenance concern rather than showing merely a temporary release gap.
Composer and Phing provide build tooling, but no security-scanning tool was detected. The build setup is a positive foundation, while the missing security practice modestly lowers confidence.
The repository has no security policy, leaving no documented path for reporting vulnerabilities or coordinating fixes. This is a supporting hygiene concern, not evidence of malicious behavior.
The assessed release is still a prerelease, and all recent releases are prereleases. Combined with the very old release history, this suggests the project never reached a mature stable release.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
ferno/loco Version @dev | — | — |
madkom/uri Version ^1.0 | — | — |
madkom/collection Version ^1.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.