Package Health

lukasss93/minecraft-tools

It has a clear MIT license, a matching repository, and a small, focused dependency set. The README and changelog help, but the single-maintainer project has no tests or security policy.

Latest 1.0PackagistPackagist

42%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

25

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

79

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

75

Health Score Breakdown

Release historydanger

The package has only one release, published nearly eight years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That is strong evidence of abandonment risk for a library dependency.

Repo commit activitydanger

The repository recorded no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the nearly eight-year release gap and providing no evidence of current maintenance.

Maintainerscaution

One registry maintainer is a thin publishing base for a package with no recent release or commit activity, increasing continuity risk.

Repo popularitycaution

The repository has only 3 stars, 0 forks, and 2 watchers. Popularity is not decisive, but these low adoption indicators provide little supporting evidence of active stewardship.

Security policycaution

The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability-reporting and response expectations unclear. This is a secondary transparency gap rather than evidence of an unsafe package.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

Luca Patera

Direct Dependencies

DependencyLast ReleaseScore
guzzlehttp/guzzle
Version ^6.3

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
7 years ago
Created
7 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform