The package has a small, focused artifact with tests, a README, and no install-time scripts. Its ownership is clear, but the project shows little recent activity and limited operational hygiene, making long-term support a concern.
38%
Total Score
25
100
75
88
The latest release was about 12 years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months and only three releases overall. This strongly lowers confidence that the package is actively maintained.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, while the repository's last push was about nine years ago. This is strong evidence of stalled maintenance.
Only one registry account has publish access. That is a limited publishing base for a user-owned project and increases continuity risk when combined with the lack of recent activity.
The repository name does not match the package name and its README does not mention the package. That weakens provenance confidence and suggests the repository may not clearly document this package.
Composer and Phing provide build tooling, but no security scanning tool is present. This is a modest hygiene gap rather than evidence that the package is unsafe.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
lstrojny/procrastinator Version dev-master | — | — |
symfony/framework-bundle Version >=2.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.