Usable with caveats: it is actively published and includes tests, but the project has no license, no recent repository commits, and remains at an early 0.0.x version. Confirm that the maintainer still supports it before adopting it for a long-lived dependency.
58%
Total Score
50
75
83
No declared license or license file was found in the package or repository, creating a real legal and reuse concern for downstream projects.
Tests are present in both the artifact and repository, and GitHub Releases provide some release documentation coverage. The missing README and changelog still reduce transparency, but the testing evidence is a meaningful compensating signal.
The repository is owned by an individual account rather than an organization, so the project appears to rely on a single-person ownership structure. This increases continuity risk when combined with zero recent commit activity.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers during the last three months, a meaningful maintenance concern even though a release was published recently.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. The missing scanning is a transparency gap rather than evidence that the package is unsafe.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
losthost/db Version ^3 | — | — |
losthost/oberbot Version 0.0.124 | — | — |
losthost/time-tracker Version ^v1 | — | — |
losthost/oberbot-model Version 2.0.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.