Usable with caveats: the release is licensed, clearly backed by its matching repository, and has repository tests, but release activity has stopped and the CI workflows have a script-injection finding with no security policy. Review the workflow before adopting it for production.
68%
Total Score
75
100
88
33
One of the two analyzed workflows contains a script-injection pattern. This is a concrete CI supply-chain concern that warrants workflow review before trusting repository automation.
There have been six releases over about 3 years, but none in the last 12 months; the latest registry release was about 18 months before collection. This indicates reduced maintenance momentum.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. The recent push date is compensating evidence that the repository is not abandoned outright, but it does not show ongoing development.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. For a small package this is a hygiene gap rather than evidence that the release is unsafe.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
jonom/focuspoint Version * | — | — |
silverstripe/cms Version ^4.0||^5.0 | — | — |
silverstripe/widgets Version * | — | — |
bummzack/sortablefile Version * | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.