Documentation, licensing, repository ownership, and package structure provide useful transparency. Maintenance has effectively stopped, leaving compatibility and abandonment concerns for a new dependency.
38%
Total Score
63
100
72
100
The latest release was over six years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That long gap is strong evidence of abandonment risk despite a previously regular release cadence.
There were zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. Combined with the release gap, this materially increases abandonment risk.
There are no open issues or pull requests, and no recent activity. This is mildly reassuring about unresolved work but cannot offset the absence of maintenance.
The repository has no stars or forks and only 12 watchers. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, but these numbers provide little community-maintenance evidence.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. This is a modest hygiene gap, not evidence that the package is unsafe.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
locomotivemtl/charcoal-admin Version >=0.14.2 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.