The package includes a clear README, changelog, MIT license, focused dependencies, and a repository that matches its name. Its small security and workflow gaps are manageable, but the lack of recent repository activity warrants caution for a new dependency.
68%
Total Score
75
100
88
67
There were zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. That recent inactivity is a meaningful maintenance concern despite the earlier release history.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. This is a modest transparency and hygiene gap rather than evidence of abandonment.
The repository has no SECURITY.md policy, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented.
The assessed version is a stable major release and recent prereleases account for none of the release profile. The reported latest version being 2.10.0 conflicts with the assessed 3.4.0 and reduces confidence in the version metadata.
The single workflow was fully analyzed with no untrusted checkout or script-injection findings, but it uses a top-level write token and its one action reference is unpinned. These are workflow hygiene concerns without a detected untrusted trigger or sink.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
craftcms/cms Version ^5.0.0 | — | — |
verbb/formie Version ^3.0.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.