The small codebase includes tests, a README, and a clear MIT license, but it has no security policy or security scanning. Its maintenance evidence is too old for a current dependency, despite the repository remaining available and matching the package.
40%
Total Score
38
100
75
83
The latest release was published about eight years ago, and there were no releases in the last 12 months. Three releases show some history, but the long pause is a substantial abandonment concern.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. Combined with the last release being about eight years ago, this strongly indicates abandonment risk.
Only one registry maintainer is listed, leaving limited visible publishing capacity. The matching personal repository provides some continuity, but not meaningful redundancy.
The repository is owned by the same individual namespace as the package, providing direct ownership alignment. It is user-backed rather than organization-backed, so maintainer redundancy is limited.
There are no open issues or pull requests, and no issue or pull-request activity in the last month. This is neutral for a small stable project but provides no evidence of current support.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.