Tests, a README, regular releases, and no install scripts provide useful consumer safeguards. The small user-owned project has limited visible security process and modest adoption.
68%
Total Score
50
94
67
One contributor made 100% of recent commits, leaving maintenance dependent on a single visible individual; the repository is user-owned, so no organizational handoff is evidenced.
Only 1 commit was recorded in the last 3 months, indicating limited recent maintenance activity despite the recent repository push.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected, leaving supply-chain hygiene less transparent.
The repository has no security policy, which weakens vulnerability-reporting transparency for a reusable library.
Both workflows omit top-level permissions, which is acceptable on its own, but all 4 action references are unpinned and one high-confidence medium-severity finding uses an archived action. No untrusted checkout or script injection was detected.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
nesbot/carbon Version ^2.0|^3.0 | — | — |
psr/container Version ^1.0|^2.0 | — | — |
hyperf/context Version ^3.0 | — | — |
hyperf/collection Version ^3.0 | — | — |
laminas/laminas-stdlib Version ^3.20 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.