Package Health

levidurfee/resend

The tiny three-file repository has no security policy, offering little transparency for a package consumers may integrate. MIT licensing and no install-time scripts reduce adoption risk, but an active fork is safer.

Latest v0.1.0PackagistPackagist

38%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

25

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

64

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

67

Health Score Breakdown

Release historydanger

This is the only release, published about two years and seven months ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That leaves little evidence of ongoing maintenance.

Repo commit activitydanger

There were no commits or active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the long gap since the last push and raising abandonment risk.

Package file treecaution

The artifact and repository each contain only three files, including a single source file and composer.json. This is a very small project footprint and provides limited evidence of maturity.

Project backingcaution

The package and repository are owned by the same individual account, so ownership is consistent, but there is no organizational backing shown to offset the single-person maintenance risk.

Repo popularitycaution

The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher. Popularity is not decisive, but this provides no supporting evidence of community use or review.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

Levi Durfee

Direct Dependencies

No direct dependencies.

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
2 years ago
Created
2 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform