The MIT license, substantial README, tests, and matching repository make adoption straightforward. Rapid early releases and a small, lightly popular project provide less evidence of durable maintenance.
66%
Total Score
50
100
83
100
The repository is owned by an individual account, so the five registry maintainer entries do not demonstrate organization-backed maintenance. This limits confidence when combined with the small project footprint.
Thirty-two releases in roughly nine months show strong initial publishing activity, but the median release interval of zero days suggests a bursty cadence rather than clearly sustained maintenance.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers during the last three months. Because the package is relatively young, this is a maintenance warning rather than evidence of abandonment by itself.
The repository has one star, zero forks, and one watcher, indicating a very small user and contributor footprint. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but this leaves less external validation and resilience.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected, leaving a modest gap in automated project hygiene.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
illuminate/cache Version ^11.0|^12.0|^13.0 | — | — |
illuminate/support Version ^11.0|^12.0|^13.0 | — | — |
illuminate/database Version ^11.0|^12.0|^13.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.