leodido/unoconv

The release is clearly licensed, documented, and has no install-time scripts. Its minimal project footprint makes long-term compatibility and ownership harder to trust.

Latest 0.6

Packagist

38%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability

Maturity

Supply Chain

Health Score Breakdown

Release history

Only one release exists, published about 12 years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment for a dependency expected to receive maintenance.

Repo commit activity

There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the repository having stopped changing about 12 years ago. This materially increases abandonment risk.

Package file tree

The package and repository have a small, matching five-file tree containing the executable, manifest, README, and license. This is coherent for a thin executable wrapper, though it offers little evidence of broader project maturity.

Project backing

The package and repository are owned by the same individual account, so the source relationship is coherent. Individual ownership does not provide organizational maintenance capacity.

Repo popularity

The repository has one star, no forks, and no watchers. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but these very low values provide no community safety net for an inactive project.