Package Health/lara-igniter/laraigniter-sortable

lara-igniter/laraigniter-sortable

This is a usable but young package with several positive supply-chain indicators: it is MIT-licensed, on a stable non-prerelease major version, not deprecated, has a small runtime dependency surface, no install lifecycle scripts, and is backed by an active-looking organization-owned repository that matches the package and references it in the README. However, the package is only 169 days old, its six releases were published in rapid succession, and the repository reports no commits or active maintainers in the last three months despite a recent push. The absence of tests, a changelog, security scanning, and a security policy reduces transparency and assurance. It is reasonable for adoption with normal dependency review, but it is not yet a mature, strongly validated dependency.

Latest v1.3.0

Packagist

68%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability

Dependencies

100

Maturity

Supply Chain

Health Score Breakdown

Package scaffolding

A substantial README documents the package, but neither the artifact nor repository contains tests or a changelog. For a young framework integration, this leaves meaningful validation and release-history gaps.

Release history

The package is only 169 days old with six releases, all within the last 12 months, and the median interval is about 26 minutes, indicating rapid early iteration rather than established release maturity.

Repo commit activity

The repository reports zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, which is a material maintenance concern. The recent push and release activity provide some compensation, so this is caution rather than a severe abandonment finding.

Repo issue activity

There are no open issues or pull requests and no issue or pull-request activity in the last month. This avoids an unresolved backlog, but also provides little evidence of community review or maintenance engagement.

Repo popularity

The repository has zero stars, forks, and watchers. This is weak supporting evidence for maturity, but popularity is not decisive for a small, specialized package.