The MIT license, readable documentation, and repository tests support adoption, while the absence of security scanning and a repository that does not identify or mention this package reduce transparency. The small maintainer list is less concerning because the source repository is user-owned.
40%
Total Score
0
71
50
The latest release was published 8 years and 8 months ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. Seven total releases provide some history, but the long publication gap is a strong abandonment concern.
The repository recorded no commits and no active maintainers in the last 3 months, consistent with the registry's long release gap. This leaves little evidence of ongoing maintenance.
The linked repository name does not match the package name and its README does not mention this package. That raises concern that the repository may not be the package's authoritative source.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools were detected. The build setup is a modest positive, while the missing security checks leave a hygiene gap.
The repository has no security policy. For an old package with no recent development activity, this further limits transparency about vulnerability reporting and maintenance responsibility.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
twig/twig Version >= 1.9.0 | — | — |
symfony/symfony Version >= 2.2.0 | — | — |
twig/extensions Version 1.0.* | — | — |
afarkas/html5shiv Version >= 3.7.0 | — | — |
components/jquery Version >= 1.9.0, < 2.0.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.