The source is organized, licensed, and has a steady release history. Recent repository activity is very thin, and the package's repository does not identify the package directly, making this a poor long-term dependency choice.
42%
Total Score
50
75
50
Packagist marks the entire package as abandoned, even though the assessed release is current and the listed replacement is the same package name. This is a serious adoption concern because the registry explicitly withdraws support expectations.
All recent commits came from one contributor. Organization ownership provides some handoff capacity, so this is not a severe risk, but the observed maintenance base remains narrow.
Only one commit was recorded in the last 3 months, indicating limited recent maintenance activity despite the recent push and release history.
The repository name does not match the package name and its README does not mention this package, so the repository linkage is less transparent. The package README identifies it as a split from a monorepo, which partly explains the mismatch but does not remove the concern.
The repository has no security policy. This is a transparency and response-process gap, but it is less significant than the abandonment and maintenance signals.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
symfony/clock Version >=6.2 | — | — |
monolog/monolog Version ^1.0 || ^2.0 || ^3.0 | — | — |
webman-tech/common-utils Version ^5.0 || dev-main | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.