The package is compact, MIT-licensed, documented, tested, and has no install-time scripts. Its single-person ownership and absent security policy provide little operational cushion for future maintenance.
40%
Total Score
0
75
50
Only two releases were published, both in June 2016, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment for a package developers would depend on.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the long period since its last push. No provided signal shows renewed maintenance.
The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, but these figures provide no meaningful external maintenance signal.
The repository has no security policy. This is a hygiene gap that leaves vulnerability reporting less transparent, although it is secondary to the much older maintenance problem.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
predis/predis Version ^1.0 | — | — |
kpicaza/etag-cache Version ^0.0.3 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.