Its MIT license and small dependency set make the package straightforward to inspect. The minimal artifact has no README or tests, and the repository lacks a security policy, limiting integration guidance and maintenance confidence.
46%
Total Score
50
100
70
50
This is the package's only release, published nearly six years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That strongly raises abandonment and compatibility risk despite recent repository activity.
The release includes no README or tests, while its GitHub release notes document this as the first release. The missing consumer documentation and test evidence are meaningful gaps for a library, though the release notes provide limited transparency.
All recent commits come from one contributor, leaving maintenance dependent on a single person. The repository is user-owned rather than organization-backed, so there is no provided evidence of an easy handoff.
The repository recorded one commit in the last three months from one active maintainer, showing some current activity but not a sustained maintenance pattern.
The repository has no security policy, reducing transparency about vulnerability reporting and response. This is a hygiene and maintenance concern rather than a severe risk on its own.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
monolog/monolog Version ^1.22 | — | — |
swiftmailer/swiftmailer Version ^6.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.