MIT licensing, repository tests, and a small runtime dependency set provide useful foundations. The missing security policy and negligible repository adoption evidence add maintenance risk for this very old client.
38%
Total Score
100
60
75
The latest release was about nine years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That long gap is strong evidence of abandonment risk for a library dependency.
The repository has 0 stars and 0 forks, with only 1 watcher. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, but these figures provide little evidence of an active user or contributor community.
The repository is not archived, which is positive, but it was last pushed about nine years ago. The inactive repository does not compensate for the absence of recent releases.
The repository has no security policy. This is a transparency gap for a client library, though it is less serious than the lack of recent maintenance.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
guzzlehttp/guzzle Version ^6.2 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.