The small codebase has no tests or security policy, limiting confidence in future maintenance. The MIT license, readable usage guide, and lack of install-time scripts are useful positives, but they do not offset the age of the project.
38%
Total Score
50
75
The package has only two releases, both published over 10 years ago, and none in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk despite the repository remaining available.
The artifact includes a 730-character README with usage instructions, but neither the package nor repository contains tests or a changelog. The README helps consumers, while the lack of tests weakens maintenance confidence.
The repository name matches the package, but its README does not mention the package. This creates some uncertainty about repository ownership, although the matching name is partial reassurance.
The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher. Popularity is not required for a healthy small package, but these counters provide no supporting evidence of active community use.
The repository has no security policy. For a small library this is not decisive, but it reduces transparency and leaves no documented security-reporting path.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
league/fractal Version ~0.9 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.