The small five-file codebase has a clear README, a matching repository, and a recorded release note. It has no tests or security scanning, so future changes would be harder to validate.
58%
Total Score
63
100
83
83
Only one registry maintainer is listed, so the project has limited visible publishing redundancy. For a user-owned, very small package this is understandable, but it increases continuity risk if the maintainer stops work.
The package and repository are both owned by the same individual account rather than an organization. That is coherent ownership, but it provides less institutional continuity than organization backing.
The package has only two releases, both published about 700 days ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is meaningful abandonment risk for a dependency that may need compatibility updates.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the long release gap. The small scope may require few changes, but there is no recent maintenance evidence.
The repository has three stars, no forks, and one watcher, providing little external evidence of adoption or community support. Popularity is only supporting evidence, so this modestly lowers confidence rather than deciding the verdict.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
laravel/socialite Version ^5.16 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.