Package Health

karpovigorok/leetcode

It has a clear README, matching MIT licensing, and no install-time scripts. Sparse repository security tooling and a very small user base add modest adoption risk.

Latest v1.0PackagistPackagist

58%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

50

Dependencies
Dependencies
Evaluates the health and security of package dependencies

100

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

81

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

75

Health Score Breakdown

Release historycaution

There has been only one release, published over five years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is a meaningful sign of limited maintenance despite the stable version.

Repo commit activitycaution

There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months. Combined with the single-release history, this raises maintenance and abandonment concerns.

Repo popularitycaution

The repository has zero stars, two forks, and one watcher. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but these figures provide little evidence of broad adoption or external review.

Repo toolingcaution

Composer is used for builds, but no security scanning tools were detected. This is a transparency and hygiene gap, though it is not severe on its own.

Security policycaution

The repository has no security policy, leaving no stated process for reporting or handling vulnerabilities. This modestly reduces transparency.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

No maintainer information available.

Direct Dependencies

No direct dependencies.

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
5 years ago
Created
5 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform