Package Health

jpi/query

Testing and release notes improve transparency, while security documentation is absent and all two workflow actions are unpinned. Maintenance depends on one active contributor, so continuity is the main limitation.

Latest v2.5.1PackagistPackagist

76%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

50

Dependencies
Dependencies
Evaluates the health and security of package dependencies

100

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

100

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

67

Health Score Breakdown

Project backingcaution

The repository is owned by an individual user rather than an organization, so the single-contributor maintenance concentration has no shown organizational handoff support.

Repo bus factorcaution

One contributor made all two recent commits, concentrating current maintenance responsibility in a single person.

Repo commit activitycaution

Only two commits were recorded in the last three months, showing limited recent development activity despite the strong release history.

Security policycaution

The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented.

Workflow auditcaution

The only workflow was fully analyzed with no dangerous triggers or audit findings, but both of its two action references are unpinned, weakening build reproducibility.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

Jahidul Pabel Islam

Direct Dependencies

DependencyLast ReleaseScore
jpi/utils
Version ^1.0
—
—
jpi/database
Version ^2.0
—
—

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
8 months ago
Created
4 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform