Regular releases, repository tests, and release notes provide useful maintenance evidence. The small contributor base and workflow hygiene issues merit attention, while licensing and dependency scope are clear.
76%
Total Score
67
100
100
75
The repository is owned by an individual user rather than an organization, so the concentrated contributor activity represents a genuine single-maintainer continuity risk.
Two contributors are active, but one made 6 of 7 recent commits, leaving maintenance substantially concentrated in one person.
The repository has no security policy, which leaves vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented.
Both workflows grant top-level write permissions, all one analyzed action reference is unpinned, and high-confidence bot-condition and template-injection findings were reported. No untrusted checkout or script-injection sink was found, so these are workflow-hygiene concerns rather than a standalone severe dependency risk.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
craftcms/cms Version ^4.0.0 || ^5.0.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.