The repository is young and shows no commits or active maintainers in the last three months. It includes tests, a clear MIT license, and no install-time scripts, but all five workflow actions are unpinned and there is no security policy.
66%
Total Score
50
89
50
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. For a package less than a year old, that is a meaningful maintenance concern, although the release history shows earlier activity.
The repository has zero stars, forks, and watchers, indicating little visible community adoption or outside review. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, so this only modestly lowers confidence in project maturity.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tool was detected. That is a transparency and maintenance gap, not evidence that the package is unsafe.
The repository has no published security policy. This makes vulnerability reporting and response expectations less clear for a library that handles blockchain clients and transactions.
The single workflow was fully analyzed with no reported audit findings or untrusted-code sinks, but all five action references are unpinned. That leaves the build exposed to avoidable dependency drift.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
vlucas/phpdotenv Version ^5.6 | — | — |
guzzlehttp/guzzle Version ^7.3 | — | — |
stephenhill/base58 Version ^1.1 | — | — |
paragonie/sodium_compat Version ^1.17 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.