Active releases, tests, release notes, and recent commits support continued maintenance. The individual maintainer base, license mismatch, missing security policy, and unpinned workflow actions leave meaningful adoption and build-reproducibility concerns.
68%
Total Score
67
100
94
75
The artifact and repository contain license files, but the manifest declares GPL-2.0-or-later while detected license text identifies GPL-3.0, creating a licensing mismatch that should be resolved before adoption.
The registry and repository are owned by the same individual account, so the concentrated contributor activity reflects a real single-person maintenance model rather than organization-backed handoff capacity.
All 62 recent commits came from one contributor, so maintenance depends heavily on a single person despite the strong activity level.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented.
All three workflows were analyzed without dangerous triggers or audit findings, but all 9 action references are unpinned; one workflow scopes permissions at job level, which does not offset the reproducibility concern.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
composer/installers Version ~1.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.