The MIT license and focused README make the package easier to evaluate. Its single maintainer and absent security policy leave limited independent assurance.
35%
Total Score
50
75
83
The package has only one release, published about 5 years and 9 months ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk for a dependency.
Only one registry account has publish access. That can be sufficient for a small package, but it leaves little visible publishing redundancy when the project is otherwise inactive.
The repository has zero stars and forks and one watcher. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but these values provide no meaningful community signal to offset the stale release history.
The repository is not archived, which is a meaningful positive, but its last push was about 5 years and 9 months ago. The inactive repository substantially offsets the non-archived status.
The repository has no security policy, reducing transparency for reporting and handling vulnerabilities. The lack of a security-scanning tool in repo_tooling provides no compensating evidence.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.