Package Health/jellygnite/silverstripe-elements

jellygnite/silverstripe-elements

The license declaration conflicts with the MIT license file, and the README says the templates are not fully functional. The package has a clear README and a stable release, but no automated tests are expected in the published artifact.

Latest 5.0.1

Packagist

56%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability

Maturity

Supply Chain

Health Score Breakdown

License

A license file is present, so the release is licensed, but the manifest declares BSD-3-Clause while the detected LICENSE text is MIT. That mismatch reduces transparency for adopters.

Package scaffolding

The artifact includes a README and this version has a GitHub release, which support consumer transparency. However, the README explicitly says the templates are not fully functional; missing tests and a changelog are normal for a published artifact.

Release history

The package has 18 releases since November 2020, but none in the last 12 months; the latest release was about two years ago, indicating stalled maintenance.

Repo commit activity

The repository recorded no commits and had no active maintainers in the last three months. This reinforces the extended pause since the latest release and raises abandonment risk.

Security policy

The linked repository has no security policy. This is a modest transparency gap for a package with no other provided security-process evidence.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

No maintainer information available.

Direct Dependencies

Dependency	Last Release	Score
silverstripe/admin Version ^2.0	—	—
bummzack/sortablefile Version ^2.2	—	—
silverstripe/framework Version ^5.0	—	—
unclecheese/display-logic Version ^3.0	—	—
dnadesign/silverstripe-elemental Version ^5.0	—	—