The package has a license, tests, a matching repository, and a minimal dependency set. Its missing security policy and scanning reduce transparency around future maintenance and security handling.
51%
Total Score
50
100
79
75
There has been only one release, published about 3 years and 10 months ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. A project template can be intentionally stable, but this still leaves maintenance uncertain.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last 3 months, consistent with the long release gap and indicating no current maintenance activity.
The repository has zero stars, forks, and watchers. This is weak supporting evidence rather than a decisive problem, but it provides no community signal to offset the lack of recent activity.
The repository uses Make and Composer, but no security-scanning tools are present. For a small template this is a hygiene gap, though it does not by itself make the release unsafe.
No security policy was found, so users have no documented reporting or response process. This lowers security transparency, especially alongside the absence of scanning tools.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.