The source project has tests, a changelog, and an MIT license, with organization backing and no install-time scripts. Its release and commit history is stale enough to make long-term maintenance a significant concern, while workflow references are not pinned.
48%
Total Score
50
100
71
67
The latest release was over four years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. The six releases were initially frequent, but the prolonged gap is a substantial maintenance concern.
There were no commits or active maintainers in the last three months. Combined with the old latest release, this materially raises abandonment risk.
There was no issue or pull-request activity in the last month, with one issue still open. This is consistent with a quiet project and adds modest maintenance concern.
The repository uses Composer, but no security scanning tools were detected. The missing scanning is a hygiene gap, not evidence that the package is unsafe by itself.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability-reporting expectations unclear. This is a transparency and maintenance gap, though it is not decisive alongside the available project evidence.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
guzzlehttp/guzzle Version ^7.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.