Clear documentation, repository tests, and an MIT license make integration easier. The young project has only two closely clustered releases, no commits in three months, and unpinned workflow actions, so maintenance remains unproven.
58%
Total Score
50
100
86
50
The package is about 100 days old and has only two releases, with both released within roughly 32 minutes of each other. That provides little evidence of an established maintenance pattern.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers during the last three months. For a package only about 100 days old, that leaves ongoing maintenance uncertain and lowers the score.
The repository has zero stars, forks, and watchers. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but the absence of any visible adoption provides no maturity signal.
The repository has no security policy and no security scanning tools. This is a transparency and response-process gap for a package handling caching, storage, and locking behavior.
The workflow audit completed cleanly with no dangerous triggers or audit findings, but both action references are unpinned. That leaves avoidable build-integrity exposure despite otherwise acceptable workflow hygiene.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
psr/cache Version ^2.0 || ^3.0 | — | — |
psr/simple-cache Version ^2.0 || ^3.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.